Hislop v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
Arizona Supreme Court
Hislop v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District, 199 Ariz. 431 (Ariz. 2001)
18 P.3d 1230; 2001 Ariz. LEXIS 14
Duty, McGregor
Hislop v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
After hearing oral argument and considering further the pleadings filed, it appears to a majority of the Court that the grant of review in this case was improvident. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the order granting review is vacated.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Review is denied.
Chief Justice Zlaket and Justice Feldman dissent from that part of this order which
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Nanette HISLOP, a single woman on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor sons, Adam, Jacob and James Hislop v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona Dycom Industries, Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona S.T.S., Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona, Defendants-Appellees Michael McLaurin and Debra McLaurin, husband and wife on their own behalf, and on behalf of their minor daughters, Latasha, Carrie, Michelle and Sherry McLaurin v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona Dycom Industries, Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona S.T.S., Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona
- Status
- Published