Desert Mountain Prop v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins
Desert Mountain Prop v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc
DESERT MOUNTAIN PROPERTIES ) Arizona Supreme Court LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ) No. CV-10-0339-PR ) Plaintiff/Appellee/ ) Court of Appeals Cross-Appellant, ) Division One ) No. 1 CA-CV 08-0802 v. ) ) Maricopa County LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE ) Superior Court COMPANY, ) No. CV2003-009686 ) Defendant/Appellant/ ) O P I N I O N Cross-Appellee. ) _________________________________ )
Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable Robert E. Miles, Judge
AFFIRMED ________________________________________________________________
Opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division One 225 Ariz. 194, 236 P.3d 421 (App. 2010)
AFFIRMED ________________________________________________________________
FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. Phoenix By J. Randall Jefferies Timothy Berg Theresa Dwyer-Federhar Louis D. Lopez Meredith K. Marder Attorneys for Desert Mountain Properties Limited Partnership
DAVID BELL & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C. Phoenix By David M. Bell Howard L. Andari Attorneys for Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company HARALSON, MILLER, PITT, FELDMAN & MCANALLY, P.L.C. Tucson By Stanley G. Feldman
And
POLI & BALL, P.L.C. Phoenix By Michael N. Poli
And
KNAPP & ROBERTS, P.C. Scottsdale By David L. Abney Attorneys for Amici Curiae Arizona Association for Justice/Arizona Trial Lawyers Association and United Policyholders
LEWIS AND ROCA, L.L.P. Phoenix By Randy S. Papetti Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Complex Insurance Claims Litigation Association ________________________________________________________________
B E R C H, Chief Justice
¶1 We granted review in this case to consider (1) whether
a commercial general liability (CGL) policy covers an insured’s
contractual liability for damage that caused only economic loss,
(2) whether the CGL policy’s contractual liability exclusion
applies only when an insured has “assumed” another’s liability
by agreeing to indemnify or hold another harmless, and (3)
whether an insured’s voluntary expenditures to repair property
damage caused by construction defects resulted from a “legal
obligation” to pay “damages.” We have jurisdiction under
Article 6, Section 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution and A.R.S.
§ 12–120.24 (2003).
- 2 - ¶2 After considering the briefs and oral arguments, the
Court affirms the opinion of the court of appeals on these
issues for the reasons set forth therein.
__________________________________ Rebecca White Berch, Chief Justice
CONCURRING:
_____________________________________ Andrew D. Hurwitz, Vice Chief Justice
_____________________________________ W. Scott Bales, Justice
_____________________________________ A. John Pelander, Justice
_____________________________________ Robert M. Brutinel, Justice
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Published