Bagley v. Lilienthal
Bagley v. Lilienthal
19 Cal. App. 273
Bagley v. Lilienthal
Opinion of the Court
This ease involves the same questions as Bagley v. Bloom et al. (No. 1041), ante, p. 255, [125 Pac. 931], and for the reasons stated in the opinion this day filed therein, the judgment is affirmed.
Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on August 14, 1912.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.