California Courts of Appeal, 1914

Scott v. Boyle

California Courts of Appeal · Decided September 22, 1914 · THE COURT. —

144 P. 311; 25 Cal. App. 806; 1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 269

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State ex rel. Western Bridge & Construction Co. v. Marsh (Neb. 1923)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The parties in the above-entitled cause having stipulated that the appeals from the judgment and order rendered in said cause in favor of the respondent, M. P. Scott, presents questions identical with those presented in the case of No. 1431, McEvers v. Boyle, ante, p. 476, [144 P. 308], decided by this court on September 21, 1914; that the facts in both cases are in all respects the same; and that all briefs and arguments filed and made on the appeal from the judgment in favor of the petitioner and respondent, J. W. McEvers (being case No. 1431), may be considered as made and filed in the appeal from the judgment and order in favor of said respondent M. P. Scott,

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered upon the authority of the case of McEvers v. Boyle (Civ. No. 1431), and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, that the order and judgment appealed from in the above-entitled cause be, and the same are hereby affirmed. *Page 807

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.