Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1914

384 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1914.

  • Collom v. Roos Bros. 142 P. 858, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Seals v. Davis 142 P. 905, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Fitzsimmons v. Wilks 142 P. 892, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Strickler 142 P. 1121, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Pedde 142 P. 894, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Laugenour 142 P. 888, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Dorris v. Alturas School District 142 P. 795, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Koskela v. Albion Lumber Co. 142 P. 851, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. De Martini 142 P. 898, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Svendsen 142 P. 861, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Diller 142 P. 797, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Bowman 142 P. 495, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Harbaugh v. Lassen Irrigation Co. 142 P. 847, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Lassen v. Board of Dental Examiners 142 P. 505, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Costa 142 P. 508, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Hoosier 142 P. 514, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Dillon v. Superior Court 142 P. 503, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Ross v. Thomas 142 P. 102, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Sims v. Frew 142 P. 106, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Swank & Letton v. Roberts 142 P. 104, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Stovel v. North Los Angeles Development Co. 142 P. 96, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Carr v. King 142 P. 131, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Parkinson Brothers Co. v. Figel 142 P. 135, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Borger v. Connecticut Fire Insurance 142 P. 115, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Parkinson Co. v. Cowell Lime Cement Co. 142 P. 140, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Charles R. Parkinson Co. v. Figel 24 Cal. App. 805, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Davidson v. Graham 141 P. 834, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Shimoda v. Bundy 142 P. 109, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Yellow Jacket Gold & Silver Mining Co. v. Holbrook 142 P. 128, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Hofer v. Grundy 142 P. 102, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Lapique v. Plummer 142 P. 107, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Lapique v. Plummer 24 Cal. App. 685, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Hofer v. Grundy 24 Cal. App. 686, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Jacks v. Taylor 142 P. 121, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Tompkins v. Superior Court 142 P. 96, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Bartol 142 P. 510, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Vaughn v. Bixby 142 P. 100, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Lusinchi 142 P. 113, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Iden 142 P. 117, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Williams 142 P. 124, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Oliver v. Stoltenberg 142 P. 108, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Polkinghorn v. Riverside Portland Cement Co. 142 P. 140, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Marks 142 P. 98, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Grubb 141 P. 1051, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Redgate v. Southern Pacific Co. 141 P. 1191, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • People v. Bonzani 141 P. 1062, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Riverdale Reclamation District No. 805 v. Shimmin 141 P. 1070, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Wright v. Boggess 141 P. 1082, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Briggs v. Hall 141 P. 1067, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  • Sociedade Do Espirito Santo v. Santa Clara Valley Bank 141 P. 1054, (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
« Prev 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑