Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1916

457 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1916.

  • Gordon v. Roberts 157 P. 15, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Swanton v. Jacks 157 P. 11, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Williams v. Parker 157 P. 550, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Cooley v. Brunswig Drug Co. 157 P. 13, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Jenkins v. Locke-Paddon Co. 157 P. 537, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Coelho v. Judson Manufacturing Co. 156 P. 1005, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • United Motor San Francisco Co. v. Callander 157 P. 561, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • People v. Phillips 157 P. 1003, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • People v. Joe Joy 157 P. 507, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Hassey v. Ruggles 156 P. 989, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • People v. Chin You 157 P. 523, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Kehrlein-Swinerton Construction Co. v. Rapken 156 P. 972, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • McIntosh v. Hunt 157 P. 839, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • San Dimas Quarry Co. v. American Surety Co. of New York 157 P. 548, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Wilson v. Shea 157 P. 543, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Orchardson v. Christie 157 P. 547, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Spader v. Rolph 156 P. 977, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Meinberg v. Jordan 157 P. 1005, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Hulbert v. All Night and Day Bank 157 P. 543, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Roberts v. Justice's Court 157 P. 511, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Luchini v. Roux 157 P. 554, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Potrero Nuevo Land Co. v. All Persons 156 P. 876, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • People v. Pitisci 157 P. 502, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Fry v. Astorg 156 P. 873, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Cain v. French 156 P. 518, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Hagenkamp v. Equitable Life Assurance Society 156 P. 520, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Pacific Railways Advertising Co. v. Carr 157 P. 529, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Dox v. R. E. Lomax Co. 156 P. 874, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Robertson v. Ballou 157 P. 523, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Evans v. Hindes 157 P. 522, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Matter of Application of Wilson 157 P. 529, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Healy v. Obear 157 P. 569, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Castera v. Superior Court 159 P. 735, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • McCarty v. Superior Court 159 P. 736, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Dean v. Hawes 157 P. 558, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Rindge Co. v. City Council 156 P. 975, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Judd v. Superior Court 157 P. 566, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Rucker v. Carpenter 157 P. 524, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Matter of Application of Howell 157 P. 553, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Crofford v. Crofford 157 P. 560, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Hester v. McMullan 157 P. 521, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Hopkins v. Sanderson 159 P. 1063, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Cavitt v. Raje 156 P. 519, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Hellings v. Wright 156 P. 365, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • White v. Standard Lumber & Wrecking Co. 157 P. 544, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • Union Trust Co. v. Ensign-Baker Refining Co. 157 P. 613, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • White v. Mathews 156 P. 372, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • People v. Chober 157 P. 533, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • People v. Turco 156 P. 1001, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
  • People v. Barbera 157 P. 532, (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
« Prev 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑