Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1919

930 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1919.

  • Rogers Brothers Co. v. Beck 184 P. 517, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Morgan v. Dibble 184 P. 704, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Rogers Bros. v. Beck 43 Cal. App. 799, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Rogers Bros. v. Beck 43 Cal. App. 799, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Rogers Bros. v. Holsapple 184 P. 516, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Rogers Bros. v. Holsapple 184 P. 517, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • American Improvement Co. v. Lilienthal 184 P. 692, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Murphy v. Bridge 184 P. 497, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Park v. Orbison 184 P. 428, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Dupes v. Dupes 184 P. 425, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • People v. Williams 184 P. 498, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Drake v. Tucker 184 P. 502, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Mott v. Wright 184 P. 517, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Mathews v. Savings Union Bank & Trust Co. 184 P. 418, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Reid v. Boyle 184 P. 423, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Miller v. Boyle 184 P. 421, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Jirku v. Brod. 184 P. 413, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Keyes v. Nims 184 P. 695, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Turner v. Talmadge 187 P. 969, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Hughes v. Silva 184 P. 415, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • McClendon v. Heisinger 184 P. 52, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Anderson v. Adler 184 P. 42, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Pacific Manufacturing Co. v. Rasmussen 184 P. 54, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Swall v. County of Los Angeles 184 P. 406, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Highland Park Investment Co. v. List 184 P. 48, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Llewellyn Iron Works 184 P. 402, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • McNulty v. Lawley 184 P. 50, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Michalek v. New Almaden Co., Inc. 184 P. 56, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Asher v. Pacific Electric Railway Co. 187 P. 976, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Barr v. Branstetter 184 P. 409, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Bates v. Ransome-Crummey Co. 184 P. 39, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Burke v. Norton 184 P. 45, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Page v. Mintzer 184 P. 690, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Hutchinson Co. v. Coughlin 184 P. 435, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Todd v. Orcutt. 183 P. 963, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Chambers v. O'Neill 184 P. 43, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Beck v. Ransome-Crummey Co. 184 P. 431, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • In re Azevedo 183 P. 952, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Pollock v. Tappan 183 P. 952, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Barnabee v. Hunstock 183 P. 951, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Lanktree v. Lanktree 183 P. 954, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Estate of Olssen 184 P. 22, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Rosenthal v. Silveira 184 P. 58, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Klemmer v. Klemmer 187 P. 85, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Royal Indemnity Co. v. Midland Counties Public Service Corp. 183 P. 960, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Dillwood v. Riecks 184 P. 35, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Dodge v. Chapman 183 P. 966, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • People v. Neetens 184 P. 27, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Spotton v. Dyer 184 P. 23, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Krenwinkel v. Henne. 183 P. 957, (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
« Prev 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 19 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑