Luchsinger v. Rolph
Luchsinger v. Rolph
208 P. 981; 58 Cal. App. 789; 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 628
Luchsinger v. Rolph
Opinion of the Court
[1] Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority ofOscar Heyman Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al.,ante, p. 499 [
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922.
All the Justices present concurred.
Richards, J., pro tem., and Myers, J., pro tem., were acting. *Page 790
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.