Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1922

641 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1922.

  • Hancock v. Clark 204 P. 1098, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Mahan v. Millar 205 P. 67, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Morales 204 P. 1088, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Vaughan v. County of Tulare 205 P. 21, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Santikian v. Weakley 204 P. 1092, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • In re Piantanido. 205 P. 17, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Rindge v. Crags Land Co. 205 P. 36, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Ross v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 205 P. 43, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • J. B. Hill v. Pinque 204 P. 1097, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Carter v. Garetson 204 P. 1090, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Fugazi v. Kelly 204 P. 866, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Fugazi v. Kelly 56 Cal. App. 244, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Wagner v. Ruppe 204 P. 1095, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Hawi Mill & Plantation Co. v. Leland 205 P. 485, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Castelhun v. San Francisco Savings & Loan Society 205 P. 65, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Bogue v. Maurer 205 P. 56, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Beales 205 P. 18, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Orange County Farmers & Merchants Ass'n 204 P. 873, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Stewart v. Tilson 204 P. 560, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Van Zandt v. Sweet 204 P. 860, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Patterson v. Reddish 204 P. 565, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Bellows v. L. A. Dock & Terminal Co. 204 P. 858, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Benning v. Nevis 204 P. 866, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Thompson v. White 204 P. 561, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • United States Trading Corp. v. Newmark Grain Co. 205 P. 29, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Morrice 204 P. 851, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Fowler v. Enriquez 204 P. 854, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Kendall v. Bunnell 205 P. 78, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • In re Scott 204 P. 568, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Armock v. United Railroads of S. F. 204 P. 856, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Hill v. Garvey 205 P. 61, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Newhall Land & Farming Co. v. Hogue-Kellogg Co. 204 P. 562, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Bowers 204 P. 548, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Anderson v. Anderson 204 P. 426, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Passow & Sons v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 204 P. 545, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Llewellyn Iron Works v. McLain 204 P. 872, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Lusk 204 P. 409, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • McLain v. Llewellyn Iron Works 204 P. 869, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Seccombe v. Case 204 P. 425, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • McLain v. Llewellyn Iron Works 204 P. 869, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Lewis v. Tulare Reclamation District No. 749 204 P. 421, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
« Prev 1 … 11 12 13 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑