Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1922

624 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1922.

  • Lachman Co. v. Central California Berry Growers' Ass'n 58 Cal. App. 794, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Lachman Co. v. Central California Berry Growers' Ass'n 58 Cal. App. 796, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Palace Hotel Co. v. Board of Supervisors 209 P. 256, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Rogers Lamb Co. v. Coast Securities Co. 209 P. 246, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Brittenbaker v. Buck 209 P. 264, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Gaver v. Early 209 P. 394, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Gaver v. Early 209 P. 390, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Armas v. Armas 209 P. 256, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Key v. Vidovich 209 P. 375, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Hahn 209 P. 268, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Garin v. Pelton 209 P. 377, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Roe 209 P. 381, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Wismer 209 P. 259, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Manning v. City of Pasadena 209 P. 253, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Garin v. Pelton 209 P. 378, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. George Fong 208 P. 1101, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Garin v. Pelton 58 Cal. App. 674, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Rodgerson v. Lebaron 209 P. 216, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Bibby v. Pacific Electric Railway Co. 209 P. 387, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Payne v. Wright 209 P. 218, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Matter of Lusher 209 P. 223, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • In Re Mathews 209 P. 220, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Scott v. Austin 209 P. 251, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • County of Los Angeles v. Luscher 209 P. 899, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Sharp 209 P. 266, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Reuter v. Gaudreau 209 P. 216, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Harpold v. Superior Court 209 P. 219, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Anglo-California Trust Co. v. Wallace 209 P. 78, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Francis v. Superior Court 209 P. 80, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Carr v. International Indemnity Co. 209 P. 83, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Tannahill v. Superior Court 209 P. 77, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Bartlett v. Dunscomb 209 P. 74, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Smith 209 P. 248, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Wyseur v. Davis 209 P. 213, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Pauli 209 P. 88, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Feeney v. Standard Oil Co. 209 P. 85, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Pavilion Ice Rink v. Bryant 209 P. 76, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • McPherson v. Walling 209 P. 212, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • McPherson v. Walling 209 P. 209, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Vandervort v. Godfrey 208 P. 1017, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Hutchinson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 209 P. 249, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Gallagher v. Boyle 209 P. 82, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • McPherson v. Walling 58 Cal. App. 792, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Henderson v. Vernalis Farming Co. 208 P. 982, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Imperial Valley Long Staple Cotton Growers Ass'n v. Davidson 209 P. 58, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Moore v. City Council of the City of Los Angeles 209 P. 64, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Noyes v. Vernalis Farming Co. 208 P. 984, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Cassella 209 P. 40, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. McCoy 208 P. 1016, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Fahey v. Madden 209 P. 41, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
« Prev 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 13 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑