Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1922

624 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1922.

  • California Drilling & Machinery Co. v. Crowder 209 P. 68, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Gambrill v. Dworack 208 P. 995, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Brush v. Pacific Electric Railway Co. 208 P. 997, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Keyes v. Rolph 208 P. 981, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Chilton v. Rolph 208 P. 981, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Wilson v. Rolph 208 P. 981, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Erskine v. Rolph 208 P. 981, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • South Pacific Co. v. Boyle 208 P. 981, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Luchsinger v. Rolph 208 P. 981, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Oscar Heyman Brother v. Bath 208 P. 981, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Griffey v. Pacific Electric Railway Co. 209 P. 45, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Wilson v. Rolph 58 Cal. App. 786, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Chilton v. Rolph 58 Cal. App. 787, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Keyes v. Rolph 58 Cal. App. 788, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Luchsinger v. Rolph 58 Cal. App. 789, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Erskine v. Rolph 58 Cal. App. 790, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Goodrum v. Abajian 208 P. 695, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Snider v. Dunn 208 P. 990, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Tayian v. Yeretzian 208 P. 985, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Hansen v. Northwestern Pacific Railroad 209 P. 63, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Gainer v. United Railroads of San Francisco 208 P. 1013, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Yarbrough v. Rosenburg 208 P. 1006, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Gold v. Phelan 208 P. 1001, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Vergano v. Denis 208 P. 694, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Meyrose v. Pacific Acceptance Corp. 208 P. 986, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Evans v. Shockley 209 P. 42, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Pendleton v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank 208 P. 702, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Murphy v. Shaffer 208 P. 1003, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Donaghue v. Hayden 208 P. 1007, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Estate of Cheda 209 P. 70, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Vice v. Morris 208 P. 1020, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Stone v. Stone 208 P. 993, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Perry v. Crabtree 208 P. 987, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Taylor v. Bernheim 209 P. 55, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Borgerson v. Borgerson 208 P. 991, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Garrette v. Grangers Business Assn. 208 P. 1010, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Hughes v. Pacific Electric Railway Co. 208 P. 335, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Pioneer Fruit Co. v. Mulcahy 208 P. 323, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Jackson v. Dolan 208 P. 315, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Cormac v. Murphy 208 P. 360, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Mulcahy v. Young 208 P. 321, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Charles Nelson Co. v. Pacific Wharf & Storage Co. 209 P. 51, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Fitts v. Mission Health & Beauty Shop 208 P. 691, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Bartlett v. Bell 208 P. 701, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • People v. Howard 208 P. 1022, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Kerns v. Scrivani 208 P. 331, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Fitch 208 P. 328, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Newby v. Bacon 208 P. 1005, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Fitch 208 P. 330, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Manasse v. Ford 208 P. 354, (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
« Prev 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 … 13 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑