California Courts of Appeal, 1929

Andrews v. Barrett

Andrews v. Barrett
California Courts of Appeal · Decided September 24, 1929 · STURTEVANT, J.
281 P. 79; 100 Cal. App. 801; 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 394
Andrews v. Barrett

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the municipal authorities to issue to the plaintiff a building permit. It was tried one week later than the action entitledAndrews v. City of Piedmont, ante, p. 700 [281 P. 78], this day filed. [1] While the actions were tried separately, the parties stipulated that the evidence in each case could be used in the other; that the reporters' transcripts could be included in one transcript; that the clerk's transcripts could be included in one transcript, and that all of the briefs could be considered in each case.

On the authority of Andrews v. City of Piedmont, supra, the judgment is affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Koford, P.J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.