Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1929

1073 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1929.

  • Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Division of Industrial Accidents & Safety 279 P. 473, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Redwine v. Trowbridge 279 P. 666, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Morgan v. Callahan 279 P. 487, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Whittier v. Auth 279 P. 491, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Mattei v. Hecke 279 P. 470, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • City of Oakland v. Williams 290 P. 1044, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Messner v. Superior Court 290 P. 919, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Barbul v. Wyatt 290 P. 919, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Messner v. Superior Court 99 Cal. App. 755, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Barbul v. Wyatt 99 Cal. App. 795, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Layne v. Malmgren 279 P. 670, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Dutart v. Woodward 279 P. 493, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Pacific-Southwest Trust & Savings Bank v. Valley Finance Corp. 279 P. 222, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Zimmerman v. Continental Life Insurance 279 P. 464, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • George v. Chaplin 279 P. 485, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Reid v. Thomas 279 P. 226, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Jansen v. Superior Court 279 P. 227, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Burge v. Midway Pacific Oil Co. 279 P. 181, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Wm. J. Bettingen Lumber Co. v. Kerrin 279 P. 163, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Barnes v. Cocke 279 P. 190, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Maddux v. Mora 279 P. 467, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Pacific Fruit Exchange v. Schropfer 279 P. 170, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Machado 279 P. 228, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Ansbach v. Department of Industrial Relations 279 P. 224, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Mazzola 279 P. 211, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Schnitman v. Husted 279 P. 194, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Sherwood v. Greater Berkeley Land Co. 279 P. 167, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Lauritsen v. Goldsmith 279 P. 168, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • City of Albany v. Meyer 279 P. 213, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Metzler v. Los Angeles Railway Corp. 279 P. 190, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Smith v. Smith 279 P. 208, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Estate of Ingram 279 P. 208, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • In re Leach and Huggins 279 P. 157, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Madera Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Arakelian, Inc. 279 P. 201, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Ferguson v. Green 278 P. 1058, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • White v. Tullett 278 P. 1056, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Glensor, Clewe & Van Dine v. Andriano 278 P. 1060, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Hougland v. Roth Blum Packing Co. 279 P. 159, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Withington v. Withington 279 P. 196, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Burroughs Adding Machine Co. v. Harris 279 P. 216, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Lubarsky v. Chavis 279 P. 205, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Brandon v. Faria 279 P. 192, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Dellarowe v. Kirchner 279 P. 210, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Schlosser 278 P. 898, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Elm v. Bennett 278 P. 906, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Estate of Jones 278 P. 912, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Murphy v. Markham 278 P. 925, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • American Multigraph Sales Co. v. Charles W. Cradick Co. 279 P. 191, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Fouch v. Werner 279 P. 183, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Allard 279 P. 182, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
« Prev 1 … 9 10 11 12 13 … 22 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑