Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1929

1063 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1929.

  • Jensen v. McCullough 278 P. 240, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Letteau v. Dumas 278 P. 459, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Marshall 278 P. 258, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Mason v. Buck 278 P. 461, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Duncan v. Oakland Bank 278 P. 485, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Thomson v. Mortgage Investment Co. 278 P. 468, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Brown v. De Waard & Sons 278 P. 257, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Busch v. Busch 278 P. 456, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Kieffer 278 P. 476, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Letteau v. Lewin 99 Cal. App. 793, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Morrell v. Caldow 278 P. 247, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Larson v. O'Brien 277 P. 1063, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Quagelli v. Quagelli 277 P. 1089, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. McGee 277 P. 1060, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Schlecht v. Schlecht 277 P. 1065, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Cook v. Board of Supervisors 277 P. 1064, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Mercantile Investment Co. v. How 278 P. 243, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Johnson v. Coyne 277 P. 1093, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Daly v. Wight 277 P. 882, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • In Re Schultz 277 P. 1049, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • E. A. Test, Inc. v. Mabrey 278 P. 249, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Hunsberger v. Hunsberger 277 P. 1092, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Ray Thomas, Inc. v. Cowan 277 P. 1086, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Hakam 277 P. 870, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Ritter v. Superior Court 278 P. 240, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Wilkerson 278 P. 466, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Soria v. Cowell Portland Cement Co. 277 P. 1061, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Brown 277 P. 908, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Estate of Bryan 277 P. 1068, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Perry 277 P. 1080, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Flinn v. Potter 277 P. 1060, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Neighbours v. Rittenhouse 278 P. 488, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. Mitchell 278 P. 241, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Scott v. Los Angeles Wholesalers Board of Trade 277 P. 875, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Moakley v. Los Angeles Pacific Railway Co. 277 P. 883, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Turley v. Roberts 277 P. 878, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Yore v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. 277 P. 878, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Ringland v. Hockensmith 277 P. 902, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Migala v. Dakin 277 P. 898, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Crowhurst v. Green 277 P. 886, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Hartman v. Moller 277 P. 875, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Christie v. Christie 277 P. 872, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Harband 277 P. 1102, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. McAllister 277 P. 1082, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Rinkenberger v. Rinkenberger 277 P. 1096, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Irer v. Gawn 277 P. 1053, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Stratton v. Cornelius 277 P. 893, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • In Re Grimes 277 P. 1052, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Service Oil Co. v. Creeden 277 P. 874, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Kelsey v. Strong 277 P. 881, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
« Prev 1 … 11 12 13 14 15 … 22 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑