Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1929

1073 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1929.

  • In re Estate of Gregson 274 P. 991, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Morton v. Sloan 275 P. 223, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Mays v. Wann 274 P. 1020, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • City of Stockton v. Ellingwood 275 P. 228, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Schainman v. All Persons 275 P. 225, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Martin v. Board of Trustees 274 P. 1015, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Campbell v. Smith 274 P. 758, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Cline v. Smith 274 P. 763, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Cline v. Smith 274 P. 761, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Bouey v. Porterfield 274 P. 766, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Schelling v. Thomas 274 P. 755, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Warfield v. Krueger 274 P. 764, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • In re Holland 274 P. 559, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Snell 274 P. 560, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. McCann 274 P. 621, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Lannagan 274 P. 607, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • McReavy v. Shaw 274 P. 612, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Sun-Maid Raisin Growers v. Jones 274 P. 557, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Security Realty Co. v. Kost 274 P. 608, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • In re Estate of Offill 274 P. 623, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Strider 274 P. 601, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Martin v. Sterling Grocery Co. 274 P. 605, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Santa Cruz Portland Cement Co. v. Snow Mountain Water & Power Co. 274 P. 617, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Nissen v. Coult 274 P. 603, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Curtis v. Wasem 274 P. 607, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Lefurgey 274 P. 1038, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Gordon v. Pfeiffer 274 P. 578, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Wiseman v. Sklar 274 P. 764, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Bernstein v. Minney 274 P. 614, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Lefurgey 96 Cal. App. 596, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Wiseman v. Sklar 96 Cal. App. 610, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Garver v. Council of City of Oakland 274 P. 375, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Mercantile Trust Co. of California v. Reay 274 P. 401, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Turney v. Shattuck 274 P. 442, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Henderson v. Electric Loop Land Co. 274 P. 445, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Julien v. West 274 P. 421, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Mand v. Rose 274 P. 392, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Hills v. Shaffer 274 P. 388, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Nowell v. Oswald 274 P. 423, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Tumelty v. Peerless Stages 274 P. 430, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Anthony v. Van 274 P. 563, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Fornaseri v. Cosmosart Realty & Building Corp. 274 P. 597, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Lynch v. Gagnon 274 P. 584, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. City of Oakland 274 P. 438, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • McHugh v. Voyce 274 P. 371, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Liberty Bank v. Nonnenmann 274 P. 568, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Bell 274 P. 393, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • In re Flannery 274 P. 396, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Panzer-Hamilton Co. v. Bray 274 P. 769, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Gibson v. Mailhebuau 274 P. 566, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
« Prev 1 … 18 19 20 21 22 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑