Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Courts of Appeal /

1929

1063 California Courts of Appeal opinions from 1929.

  • Vale v. Maryland Casualty Co. 281 P. 1058, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Hammond Lumber Co. v. Bloodgood 281 P. 1101, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Reeves v. Taylor 281 P. 1066, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Peterson v. First National Bank 281 P. 1104, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Patents Process Inc. v. Superior Court 282 P. 21, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Kircher v. Hunter 281 P. 1047, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Pierce v. Hill 281 P. 676, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Katz v. People's Finance & Thrift Co. 281 P. 1097, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Ingold v. Daly Bank & Trust Co. 281 P. 1075, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Andrew v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance 281 P. 1091, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Bank of Italy v. Welbilt Auto Body Co. 281 P. 1060, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Sourisseau v. Moore 281 P. 1035, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Best v. Paul 281 P. 1089, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Crabbe v. Rhoades 282 P. 10, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Keele v. Clouser 281 P. 1073, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Smith v. Moore Mill & Lumber Co. 281 P. 1049, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Pray v. Trower Lumber Co. 281 P. 1036, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Swenson v. Swenson 281 P. 674, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Bent Bros., Inc. v. Campbell 281 P. 717, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Wood v. Nellis-Ryus 281 P. 703, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Harbor Construction Co. v. Walters 281 P. 1062, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Pasqual v. De Vries 281 P. 1057, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Security Investors Realty Co. v. Superior Court 281 P. 709, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Knight v. Carlin 281 P. 712, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Morganthaler v. Krieg 281 P. 692, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • MacDonald v. Superior Court 281 P. 672, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Forrest v. Pickwick Stages System 281 P. 723, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Blodgett v. Greenfield 281 P. 694, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Pendell v. Warren 281 P. 658, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Richardson v. Morrison 281 P. 726, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Lambert v. Kamp 281 P. 690, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Crozier v. Soquel 281 P. 698, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Wyatt 881 P. 629, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Ross v. Thirlwall 281 P. 714, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Alexander 281 P. 697, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Wilson 281 P. 700, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Kimes v. Davidson Investment Co. 281 P. 639, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • O'Neill v. Hicks 281 P. 531, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Burlingame v. Traeger 281 P. 1051, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Welch v. Gunn 281 P. 704, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Biltmore Drug Store v. Superior Court 281 P. 710, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Withers v. Southern Pacific Co. 281 P. 518, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Greve v. Taft Realty Co. 281 P. 641, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Arnold 288 P. 28, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Cornelius v. Cornelius 281 P. 705, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Seaman 281 P. 660, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Barlow v. Southern Trust Co. 281 P. 531, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • People v. Hewitt 281 P. 666, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Grey v. Milligan 281 P. 656, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
  • Witherow v. United American Insurance 281 P. 668, (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
« Prev 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 22 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑