California Courts of Appeal, 1931

In Re Brune

In Re Brune
California Courts of Appeal · Decided April 8, 1931
298 P. 80; 113 Cal. App. 254; 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 933

In Re Brune

Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Habeas corpus. [1] Petitioner claims he is unlawfully imprisoned for failure to comply with an order requiring him to pay certain sums for the support and maintenance of his wife. He alleges that since the making of the order a disability to comply therewith has arisen. The petition is denied on the ground that no application for discharge has been first made in the court below. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1143; In re Wilson, 75 Cal. 580 [17 P. 698].) *Page 255

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.