California Courts of Appeal, 1931

In re Brune

California Courts of Appeal · Decided April 8, 1931

298 P. 80; 113 Cal. App. 254; 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 933

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision. The 2 that cite it most often are listed here.

Harris v. Superior Court of State of California for the County of Los Angeles (9th Cir. 1974)
In re Elias (Cal. Ct. App. 1962)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Habeas corpus. [1] Petitioner claims he is unlawfully imprisoned for failure to comply with an order requiring him to pay certain sums for the support and maintenance of his wife. He alleges that since the making of the order a disability to comply therewith has arisen. The petition is denied on the ground that no application for discharge has been first made in the court below. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1143; In re Wilson, 75 Cal. 580 [17 P. 698].) *Page 255

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.