California Courts of Appeal, 1932

Smith v. Superior Court

California Courts of Appeal · Decided July 12, 1932 · Docket No. 8055.

13 P.2d 400; 124 Cal. App. 685; 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 919 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Goldman v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1954)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

[1] It appearing that although several months have expired since the alternative writ of prohibition was issued herein, and that in the absence of either stipulation by the parties hereto, or by order of this court, respondent has entered no appearance, either by answer to the petition for the writ, or by memorandum of points and authorities in relation thereto;

And it further appearing by the uncontradicted facts set forth in the petition for said writ, as well as by the law which is pertinent to the relief prayed for by petitioner, that his claim is well founded:

It is ordered that the alternative writ hereinbefore issued by order of this court be and the same is made peremptory. *Page 686

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.