Union Trust Co. v. Novotny
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Martin v. California Investment & Financial Co. (Cal. 1933)
- Rees v. Roberts (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
- Hunter v. Paxton (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
- Di Giacomo v. Southern Pacific Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
- Steffey v. Standard Stations, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
- Schneider v. Title Guarantee Trust Co. (Cal. 1933)
- Schneider v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. (Cal. 1933)
- Schneider v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. (Cal. 1933)
- Steffey v. Standard Stations, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
- Stewart v. Marple (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
- Stewart v. Marple (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In support of its motion to dismiss the appeal herein for failure to file a transcript of the record within the prescribed time, respondent has filed the certificate of the county clerk as required by Bule VI of the Buies of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal. The facts set forth in such certificate are uncontradicted *419 and it therefrom appears that notice of appeal was filed on October 13, 1931, and that neither a hill of exceptions has been settled as provided by section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure nor has a transcript been prepared in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. It further appears that the statutory period within which a record on appeal may be prepared and filed under cither method has expired. Respondent’s motion should therefore be granted (General Motors etc. Corp. v. Holman, 63 Cal. App. 17 [217 Pac. 1086]; People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal. App. 139 [283 Pac. 981]). The appeal is dismissed.
Marks, Acting P. J., and Morton, J., pro tern., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.