Starkweather v. Eddy
Starkweather v. Eddy
7 P.2d 744; 120 Cal. App. 121; 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 90
(Pacific Reporter, Second Series)
Starkweather v. Eddy
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff and respondent moved to dismiss the appeal in the instant case upon the ground that *Page 122 the same was not pursued in this court within the time prescribed by law.
[1] Nothing more than the filing and serving of a notice of appeal appears to have been accomplished prior to expiration of the time for ordering a transcript. The motion to dismiss is not resisted, and since it falls squarely within the purview ofGeneral Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Holman,
The appeal is dismissed.
Works, P.J., and Fricke, J., pro tem., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.