California Courts of Appeal, 1932

Taketa v. Policy Holders Life Ins. Assn.

California Courts of Appeal · Decided November 30, 1932

16 P.2d 312; 127 Cal. App. 758; 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 519 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Runkle v. Lane (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

[1] Under the authority of section 3, Rule V, of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, respondent moves to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment upon the ground that the appeal was *Page 759 taken for delay only and that the questions on which the decision of the case depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument. After examining the transcript on appeal in connection with the points made in appellant's brief it is our opinion that the appeal presents a debatable question of law, and therefore the motion is denied.

Thompson (R.L.), J., and Plummer, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.