California Courts of Appeal, 1934

DeBolt v. Superior Court

California Courts of Appeal · Decided December 5, 1934 · Stephens

2 Cal. App. 2d 619

Opinion

2 Cal.App.2d 619 (1934)

ETHEL M. DeBOLT, Petitioner,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 9983.

California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two.

December 5, 1934.

Charles M. Easton and Palmyra Pressly for Petitioner.

David W. Richards and Henry F. Poyet for Respondents.

Stephens, P. J.

[1] One of the defendants in an action which was decided adversely to her seeks by a petition in mandamus to have restored to her bill of exceptions upon appeal matters stricken therefrom by the trial court. Section 652 of the Code of Civil Procedure prescribes the procedure to be taken in such a case.

A peremptory writ denied.

Crail, J., and Scott, J., pro tem., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

DeBolt v. Superior Court

Opinion

ETHEL M. DeBOLT, Petitioner,v.THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents.

ETHEL M. DeBOLT, Petitioner,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents.