California Courts of Appeal, 1934

Beemer v. Roher

California Courts of Appeal · Decided March 10, 1934 · KNIGHT, J.

30 P.2d 549; 137 Cal. App. 298; 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 831 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Tyre v. Aetna Life Insurance (Cal. 1960)
Henry v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

[1] Pending the hearing of the appeal in the above-entitled cause, one of the appellants, Pacific States Savings and Loan Company, applied to this court for and *Page 299 was granted a writ of supersedeas to stay the execution of that part of the judgment directing said company to pay "forthwith" a sum of money in its possession, which the trial court by its judgment decreed was the property of one of the respondents. Subsequently the respondents moved to vacate and set aside said writ. The appeal has now been determined on the merits (Beemer v. Roher, ante, p. 293 [30 P.2d 547]), the judgment being reversed with directions to revise and re-enter the same in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion filed therein. The entry of the revised judgment will supersede the one appealed from, and therefore the questions raised by respondents' motion to vacate and set aside said writ of supersedeas have become moot. Upon that ground respondents' motion is dismissed.

Tyler, P.J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.