In re Taylor
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Bueno (Cal. Ct. App. 1960)
- United States v. George Gordon Liddy (D.C. Cir. 1975)
- Ellis v. Department of Motor Vehicles (Cal. Ct. App. 1942)
- People v. Hernandez (Cal. Ct. App. 1966)
- Serra v. Cameron (Colo. 1956)
- Oster v. Municipal Court (Cal. 1955)
- People v. Cravens (Cal. Ct. App. 1953)
- People v. Rickson (Cal. Ct. App. 1952)
- Epps v. Slavin (Connecticut Superior Court 1941)
- Epps v. Slavin (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas 1941)
- In re Eyre (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
A petition on behalf of Claude Taylor for a writ of habeas corpus was allowed and wre are here considering the matter after return and submission.
Taylor was convicted of an offense, probation was denied and he was sentenced to the “County jail . . . for the term of ninety days, to be served from 7.00 p. m. of Monday to 6.00 p. m. of Wednesday”. (Quotation from judgment.) The ninety days have not run and it is claimed that Taylor is imprisoned under a void sentence. We think not. By the provisions of section 1203 of the Penal Code suspension of sentence is limited to probation and probation in this case was specifically denied. The sentence to the county jail for ninety days is valid but the instruction to the sheriff to free the prisoner several days of each week
The writ is discharged and the prisoner is remanded.
Craig, J., and Desmond, J., concurred.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.