Ray v. California Home Building Loan Co.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- California Teachers Assn. v. Nielsen (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)
- Hagan v. Fairfield (Cal. Ct. App. 1961)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
MARTIN E. RAY et al., Petitioners,
v.
CALIFORNIA HOME BUILDING LOAN COMPANY, etc., et al., Respondents.
California Court of Appeals. First Appellate District, Division One.
Ellis, Lyman & Steindorf for Petitioners.
No appearance for Respondents.
The Court.
[1] Ordinarily mandamus will not lie to compel a transfer of corporate stock; a suit in equity is the *276 proper remedy. There is nothing contained in the petition to show that this remedy is inadequate. (Spangenberg v. Western Heavy Hardware & Iron Co., 166 Cal. 284 [135 P. 1127].) The petition is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.