Ferslew v. Andersen

California Courts of Appeal
Ferslew v. Andersen, 11 Cal. App. 2d 400 (1936)
53 P.2d 768; 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 362
McComb

Ferslew v. Andersen

Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent after a trial before a court without a jury.

Appellant has not observed the provision of Rule VIII, section 2, of this court, which requires that the question involved on appeal in a civil action be set forth on the first page of the opening brief without any other matter appearing thereon. (Rule VIII, sec. 2, p. 10, Rules of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the State of California.)

In the instant case there is a total absence of a compliance with the foregoing rule. This court cannot assume the task of searching the record for the purpose of discovering errors not pointed out by counsel. It is the duty of counsel to comply with Rule VIII, supra, in its entirety.

For the foregoing reasons the appeal is dismissed.

Grail, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
MAX FERSLEW v. ANTONE ANDERSEN
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published