California Courts of Appeal, 1936

Reposa v. Pearce

California Courts of Appeal · Decided January 30, 1936 · Nouese

11 Cal. App. 2d 520; 54 P.2d 476; 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 386

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Reposa v. Pearce (Cal. Ct. App. 1936)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

NOUESE, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order amending a bill of exceptions in Reposa v. Pearce, No. 9829 (ante, p. 517 [54 Pac. (2d) 475]). The amendment was made to include the original statements of indebtedness included in the plaintiff’s claim for special damages. Because of the judgment in the main case holding that plaintiff was not entitled to any damages, the question raised here has become moot.

For these reasons the appeal is dismissed.

Sturtevant, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.