Potter v. City of Compton

California Courts of Appeal
Potter v. City of Compton, 15 Cal. App. 2d 238 (1936)
59 P.2d 540
Shinn

Potter v. City of Compton

Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

Appellants challenge the jurisdiction of the trial court to grant relief from the default of respondent, resulting from his inadvertent failure to file his memorandum of costs within the statutory time after notice of entry of judgment. Upon authority of Soda v. Marriott, 130 Cal. App. 589 [20 Pac. (2d) 758], we hold that the court had jurisdiction to make the order appealed from, and it is therefore affirmed.

Houser, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
THOMAS J. POTTER v. THE CITY OF COMPTON (a Municipal Corporation)
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published