California Courts of Appeal, 1936

Potter v. City of Compton

California Courts of Appeal · Decided July 7, 1936 · Shinn

15 Cal. App. 2d 238; 59 P.2d 540

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Spellens v. Spellens (Cal. 1957)
Lane v. Pacific Greyhound Lines (Cal. 1947)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

Appellants challenge the jurisdiction of the trial court to grant relief from the default of respondent, resulting from his inadvertent failure to file his memorandum of costs within the statutory time after notice of entry of judgment. Upon authority of Soda v. Marriott, 130 Cal. App. 589 [20 Pac. (2d) 758], we hold that the court had jurisdiction to make the order appealed from, and it is therefore affirmed.

Houser, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.