California Courts of Appeal, 1936

Potter v. City of Compton

Potter v. City of Compton
California Courts of Appeal · Decided July 7, 1936 · Shinn
15 Cal. App. 2d 238; 59 P.2d 540

Potter v. City of Compton

Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

Appellants challenge the jurisdiction of the trial court to grant relief from the default of respondent, resulting from his inadvertent failure to file his memorandum of costs within the statutory time after notice of entry of judgment. Upon authority of Soda v. Marriott, 130 Cal. App. 589 [20 Pac. (2d) 758], we hold that the court had jurisdiction to make the order appealed from, and it is therefore affirmed.

Houser, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.