In re Landowitz
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Doyle v. Board of Barber Examiners (Cal. Ct. App. 1963)
- French Art Cleaners v. State Board of Dry Cleaners (Cal. Ct. App. 1948)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of CARL LANDOWITZ for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
California Court of Appeals. First Appellate District, Division One.
Edward B. Dienstag and I. M. Peckham for Petitioner.
Matthew Brady, District Attorney, and William J. Connolly, Assistant District Attorney, for Respondent.
Walter McGovern, Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Respondent.
Memorandum
The Court.
[1] The questions presented in the above matter are essentially the same as those decided in In re Kazas, an application for a writ of habeas corpus, ante, p. 161 [70 PaCal.2d 962]; and on the authority thereof the petitioner is discharged.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.