California Courts of Appeal, 1937

Clay v. Clay

California Courts of Appeal · Decided March 17, 1937 · Civ. No. 11341 · Crail

19 Cal. App. 2d 589; 65 P.2d 1363; 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 482

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Shapiro v. Union Bank (Cal. Ct. App. 1974)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

CRAIL, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

It is a sufficient compliance with the constitutional provision, which requires us to state the reasons for our decisions in writing, to say in this ease that the appellant and respondent have stipulated that the decision herein be rendered.

The stipulation also provides that this court direct the trial court to enter judgment for the defendant. But this we refuse to do. This is a divorce case and the trial court may well exercise its authority in the premises after trial or after hearing on a motion.

*590The judgment is reversed. Each party is to pay his or her own costs on appeal. Let remittitur issue forthwith.

Wood, J., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.