California Courts of Appeal, 1938

Bruce v. Tunstall

Bruce v. Tunstall
California Courts of Appeal · Decided January 13, 1938 · Jennings
24 Cal. App. 2d 370; 75 P.2d 120; 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 911

Bruce v. Tunstall

Opinion of the Court

JENNINGS, J.

The certificate of the county clerk of the county wherein this action was tried has been submitted in support of this motion by respondents to dismiss the appeal herein for failure of appellant to file a transcript on appeal within the required time. Prom the aforementioned certificate it appears that notice of appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of respondents was filed on July 10, 1937, that no proceedings for settlement of a bill of exceptions or for the preparation of a reporter’s transcript are now pending in the trial court, the proceedings therefore initiated by appellant H. P. Turnstall having been terminated by order of the trial court on October 22, 1937. Under these circumstances the motion is proper and must be granted. (Christensen v. Couey, 136 Cal. App. 268 [28 Pac. (2d) 689].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.