Roche v. McColgan
Roche v. McColgan
80 Cal. App. 2d 983
Roche v. McColgan
Opinion
THEO. J. ROCHE, Appellant,
v.
CHARLES J. McCOLGAN, as State Franchise Tax Commissioner, Respondent.
California Court of Appeals. Third Dist.
Sullivan, Roche, Johnson & Farraher and Eustace Cullinan for Appellant.
Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, and James E. Sabine, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.
THE COURT.
It appears from the stipulation of the parties that the same legal questions are presented in this proceeding as those in Cullinan v. McColgan, 3 Civ. No. 7341, ante, page 976 [183 P.2d 115], this day filed.
For the reasons stated in our opinion in that case the judgment herein is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.