California Courts of Appeal, 1950

Baldie v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

California Courts of Appeal · Decided May 18, 1950 · Civ. No. 14350

97 Cal. App. 2d 614; 217 P.2d 1011; 1950 Cal. App. LEXIS 1580

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Baldie v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASS'N (Cal. Ct. App. 1950)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Counsel have asked us to clarify the apportionment of costs on the two appeals. Under the Rules on Appeal (rule 26(a)) the prevailing party is entitled to his costs. These appeals were presented on one clerk’s and one reporter’s transcript and one set of briefs. However the pleadings, evidence and arguments are separate. Respondent Pacheco is entitled to costs against appellant on his appeal and appellant is entitled to costs on the Bullock appeal. The costs should be apportioned on the basis of the portions of the transcripts and briefs devoted to each case.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.