Santa Barbara Lodge No. 605 v. Penzner
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hammon v. American Exploration & Mining Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1962)
- Prawoto v. PrimeLending (United States District Court for the Central District of California 2010)
- Apartments, Inc. v. Trott (Cal. Ct. App. 1959)
- Foundation Engineers, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA CTY. (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
SANTA BARBARA LODGE NO. 605, LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE (a Corporation), Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM L. PENZNER, Respondent.
California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.
McGee & De Loreto for Appellant.
Schauer, Ryon & McMahon and Guy E. Ward for Respondent.
WILSON, J.
This action was commenced in Santa Barbara County for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property in that county, or for damages in the event defendant should be unable to fulfill the terms of the contract.
Defendant's motion for change of venue to Los Angeles County on the ground that he is a resident of the latter county was granted and plaintiff has appealed from the order.
[1] The county in which the real property is situated is the county in which the case should be tried. (Code Civ. Proc., 392; Kopke v. Carlson, 98 Cal.App. 155, 157 [276 P. 606]; McFarland v. Martin, 144 Cal. 771, 774 [78 P. 239].)
Order reversed.
Moore, P. J., and McComb, J., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.