Esquivel v. Raney
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Bolon v. Pennington (Ariz. Ct. App. 1966)
- Leo v. Dunlap (Cal. Ct. App. 1968)
- Davis v. Taliaferro (Cal. Ct. App. 1963)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
JESS ESQUIVEL et al., Appellants,
v.
DR. RUPERT B. RANEY, Respondent.
California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three.
Orloff & Pollack and Ruthe Jacobson for Appellants.
Ralph N. Highsmith and Henry E. Kappler for Respondent. *163
VALLEE, J.
Plaintiffs appealed from an order setting aside the entry of the default of defendant Rupert B. Raney. No judgment has been entered in the action.
[1] Section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure enumerates the various orders from which appeals may be taken. An order setting aside a default before judgment is entered is not one of the orders enumerated. It is therefore not appealable. (See cases cited in 5 West's Cal.Dig. (1951) Appeal and Error, 152, 113(3).)
Appeal dismissed.
Shinn, P. J., and Wood (Parker), J., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.