Offer v. McMillan

California Courts of Appeal
Offer v. McMillan, 101 Cal. App. 2d 840 (1951)
226 P.2d 380; 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1102
Deirup

Offer v. McMillan

Opinion of the Court

DEIRUP, J. pro tem.

The plaintiffs have appealed *841error. There is no basis for a discussion of this point, for we cannot take the opinion into account. β€œThe findings and conclusions constitute the final decision of the court and an oral or written opinion cannot be resorted to for the purpose of impeaching or gainsaying the findings and judgment.” (Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co., 71 Cal.App.2d 777, 781 [163 P.2d 756].)

The judgment is affirmed. Appeal from order denying new trial dismissed.

Adams, P. J., and Peek, J., concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
KARL OFFER v. MABEL V. McMILLAN
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published