California Courts of Appeal, 1951

Penland v. Golden

California Courts of Appeal · Decided November 5, 1951 · Civ. No. 18357 · Hanson

107 Cal. App. 2d 256; 236 P.2d 823; 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1892

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Carley v. City of Santa Rosa (Cal. Ct. App. 1957)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro. tem.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint with leave to amend. As an appeal does not lie from such an order, but only from a judgment entered thereon we are without jurisdiction to review the case on its merits. (Cornic v. Stewart, 179 Cal. 242 [176 P. 164].) Accordingly, we are required on our own motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.