California Courts of Appeal, 1951

Penland v. Golden

Penland v. Golden
California Courts of Appeal · Decided November 5, 1951 · Hanson
107 Cal. App. 2d 256; 236 P.2d 823; 1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1892

Penland v. Golden

Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro. tem.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint with leave to amend. As an appeal does not lie from such an order, but only from a judgment entered thereon we are without jurisdiction to review the case on its merits. (Cornic v. Stewart, 179 Cal. 242 [176 P. 164].) Accordingly, we are required on our own motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.