People v. Smith CA3
Opinion
Filed 11/5/15 P. v. Smith CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(El Dorado)
---- THE PEOPLE, C078877
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. S07CRF0275) v.
KONOLUS IRWIN SMITH,
Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant Konolus Irwin Smith was sentenced on February 4, 2008, to two concurrent terms of 25 years to life on convictions of corporal injury to a spouse or cohabitant and making criminal threats. The judgment was affirmed on appeal and remittitur issued on September 14, 2009.1 Thereafter, on February 2, 2015, defendant filed a motion in the trial court seeking a reduction of his $10,000 restitution fine based on his alleged inability to pay. The trial court denied the motion, noting defendant could have, but did not, raise the issue in his previous appeal.2 Defendant appeals.
Counsel for defendant filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal.3 (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The trial court’s order is affirmed.
/s/
Blease, Acting P. J.
We concur:
/s/ Nicholson, J. /s/ Robie, J.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.