California Courts of Appeal, 2021

People v. Grove CA3

People v. Grove CA3
California Courts of Appeal · Decided March 15, 2021

People v. Grove CA3

Opinion

Filed 3/15/21 P. v. Grove CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sutter) ----

THE PEOPLE, C091659 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. CRF170791, CRF170001924A, v. CRF190003014) JEREMY LEE GROVE, Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Jeremy Lee Grove has asked this court to conduct an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Finding no arguable error in defendant’s favor, we affirm.

BACKGROUND Defendant, armed with a knife, was in a bar fight with two other patrons of the bar. He punched one of the men and swung the knife at the other, whose face was cut.

Defendant also knowingly and unlawfully possessed a usable amount of methamphetamine while in a penal institution.

In case No. CRF-17-1924 defendant pleaded no contest to one count of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)),1 one count of assault by force likely to produce great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)(4)), and admitted having served a prior prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). In case No. CRF-17-00791 defendant pleaded no contest to one count of bringing contraband into jail (§ 4573, subd. (a)). The parties agreed to a stipulated term of seven years, which included a one-year term on the prior prison term enhancement.

Defendant failed to appear at sentencing. He was charged with felony failure to appear (§ 1320.5) and alleged he had committed a felony while released on bail.

Defendant pleaded no contest to the failure to appear and admitted the on-bail enhancement. The parties agreed to a stipulated sentence of two years eight months.

On its own motion, the trial court struck the prior prison term enhancement. The court sentenced defendant in accordance with the plea to an aggregate term of eight years eight months as follows: the upper term of four years on the assault with a deadly weapon, a consecutive one year on the assault likely to produce great bodily injury, a consecutive one year on the contraband in jail, a consecutive eight months for the failure to appear, and an additional two years for the on-bail enhancement. The trial court awarded defendant 877 days of presentence custody credit and ordered defendant to pay direct victim restitution as well as mandatory fines and fees.

Defendant did not obtain a certificate of probable cause.

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. DISCUSSION Appointed counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts and procedural history of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.)

Defendant was advised by counsel of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days from the date the opening brief was filed. More than 30 days have elapsed, and defendant has not filed a supplemental brief.

Our review of the record pursuant to Wende has disclosed no arguable errors in defendant’s favor.

DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed.

/s/ Duarte, J.

We concur:

/s/ Raye, P. J.

/s/ Mauro, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.