1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 In re ) Case No. 11-20679-E-7 ) Docket No. MWB-2 9 BRANDON SCOTT MADEROS and ) LaRAIN JOY MADEROS, ) DATE: February 4, 2021 10 ) TIME: 10:30 a.m. Debtors. ) DEPT: E 11 ) 12 SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 13 TO CIVIL MINUTES (Dckt. 47) RE MOTION TO AVOID JUDGMENT LIEN 14 The court issues these Supplemental Findings and Conclusions to the court’s Findings of Fact 15 and Conclusions of Law stated in the Civil Minutes (Dckt. 47) for the February 4, 2021 hearing on 16 the Motion for Order to Avoid Judgment Lien filed by Brandon Maderos and LaRain Maderos, the 17 Debtors in this bankruptcy case. 18 On January 7, 2021, Brandon and LaRain Maderos, the two Chapter 7 Debtors in this 19 Bankruptcy Case, (“Debtors”) filed a Motion to Avoid a Judgment Lien (the “Motion”). Dckt. 41. 20 A hearing was conducted on the Motion on February 4, 2021, and the court issued a detailed ruling 21 which is stated in the Civil Minutes of that hearing. Dckt. 47. 22 The creditor holding the asserted judgment lien at issue is LVNV Funding, LLC, assignee of 23 HSBC Bank. Civil Minutes, p. 1; Dckt. 47. The abstract of judgment, which is a judgment 24 enforcement device in California to create a judgment lien on real property, at issue was recorded on 25 June 14, 2010, which was prior to the January 10, 2011 filing of this bankruptcy case by Debtors. 26 Id. The judgment for which the abstract of judgment would create a judgment lien was entered in 27 the California Superior Court on March 1, 2010 (the “Judgment”). See Abstract of Judgment, ¶ 8, 28 filed as Exhibit 1 in support of the Motion, Dckt. 44. 1 On May 16, 2011, Debtors were granted a discharge in this bankruptcy case, discharging the 2 March 1, 2010 Judgment identified in the Abstract of Judgment. 3 As addressed in the Civil Minutes, the entry of a bankruptcy discharge renders void any 4 judgment as a determination of Debtors’ personal liability of a discharged debt. 11 U.S.C. 5 § 524(a)(1); Civil Minutes, p. 3; Dckt. 47. Additionally, it operates as a statutorily created injunction 6 against any attempt to collect or recover a discharged debt as a personal liability of Debtors. 11

(a)(2); Civil Minutes, p. 3, Dckt. 47. As this court quoted from Collier on Bankruptcy, 8 with respect to a discharged debt, the judgment creditor cannot obtain a judgment lien on post- 9 bankruptcy property acquired by a debtor: 10 A prepetition judgment that has been made void by this section cannot be the basis for a creditor obtaining a lien on property that was not subject to a lien 11 before bankruptcy. Nor may a creditor proceed in rem against a property interest of the debtor if the creditor had no lien before the bankruptcy case and the debtor’s 12 personal liability has been discharged. 13 4 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY P 524.02 (16TH 2020). 14 The property of Debtors identified as being the subject of concern by a title company is 15 identified as 1497 Hooker Oak Avenue, Chico, California (the “Property”), which Property is stated 16 to have been acquired by Debtors in 20141 - three years after Debtors obtained the discharge of the 17 Judgment obligation and precluding the Abstract of Judgment attaching to the post-bankruptcy 18 acquired Property. 19 There being no Judgment Lien that could attach to the Property, the Judgment having been 20 discharged by the Discharge entered in this case, there is nothing to “avoid” as requested in Debtors’ 21 Motion. Motion, p. 2, Prayer ¶ 1; Dckt. 41. While the Motion does not identify the legal basis for 22 “avoiding” the nonexistent judgment lien, such relief is commonly sought pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 23 § 522(f) when a pre-petition judgment lien has attached to a debtor’s pre-petition exempt property 24 and impairs the exemption. Such basis has not been asserted for this Motion, and based on the 25 evidence presented cannot since there was no pre-petition lien on the Property that was first obtained 26 by Debtors three years after the Judgment was discharged. 27 28 1 Debtors Declaration, ¶ 3; Dckt. 43. 1 In the Motion it is further stated that Debtors are attempting to sell the Property, but cannot 2 do so because the (unidentified) title company is requiring that Debtors pay the discharged Judgment 3 for which there can be no judgment lien on the Property Debtors acquired three years after they filed 4 bankruptcy and obtained their Discharge. Such demand for payment of the discharged Judgment, 5 requiring such payment as the “quid pro quo” for closing a sale escrow, and receipt of any monies 6 by LVNV Funding, LLC, assignee of HSBC Bank that Debtor was forced to pay on the discharged 7 judgment would be a violation of the Discharge and Discharge Injunction, and subject the parties 8 demanding, forcing, and receiving such payment to corrective and punitive sanctions. Such 9 proceedings are for contempt for violating a discharge injunction and addressed in the bankruptcy 10 court. Walls v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,

(9th Cir. 2002). 11 Respecting the needs of Debtors and the title company for an order addressing this issue, the 12 court requested that counsel for Debtor provide counsel for the title company a copy of the court’s 13 ruling stated in the Civil Minutes that there is no judgment lien, and then lodge with the court a 14 proposed order addressing there not being a lien on the Property - and not have the court 15 misrepresent that it was purporting to “avoid” a nonexistent lien. Civil Minutes, p. 5; Dckt. 47. The 16 court also noted in Footnote 1 in the Civil Minutes that as of January 2021, more than ten years have 17 passed since the March 1, 2010 entry of the Judgment and it was not clear whether the Judgment had 18 been renewed (possibly in violation of the Discharge Injunction) or whether the Judgment, and any 19 lien relating thereto, had terminated due to age. Cal. C.C.P. §§ 683.180, 697.310. 20 On February 4, 2021, the same day as the hearing and before the court could have the Civil 21 Minutes docketed, counsel for Debtor lodged with the court a proposed order concerning the 22 nonexistent lien that the title company was purportedly forcing the Debtor to pay LVNV Funding, 23 LLC, assignee of HSBC Bank for the discharged Judgment for the sale of the Property obtained by 24 Debtor after having been granted a discharge. The proposed order purports to say that LVNV 25 Funding, LLC, assignee of HSBC Bank had a lien on the post-discharge obtained Property and that 26 the court then avoided such nonexistent lien. 27 The court cannot, and will not, engage in such legal fabrication, even if is demanded by a title 28 company and/or a debtor’s counsel. 1 Since violation of the Discharge Injunction is addressed by contempt, the court can address 2 || this issue in this Motion, and not require Debtors to file (and the violators pay for) an adversary 3 || proceeding to acquire title. 4 The court shall issue a separate order stating the effect of the discharge on the pre-petition 5 || judgment, the voiding of the judgment as provided in

(a)(1), the potential violation 6 || of the Discharge Injunction by the attempted enforcement of the discharged judgment against post- 7 || bankruptcy acquired property by Debtors, and the civil contempt enforcement of the Discharge 8 || Injunction and rectifying the violations thereof. Dated: February 17, 2021 By the Court 10 11 rf)

B Ronald H. Sargis, Judge United! States Bankerfptcy Court 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

1 ° Instructions to Clerk of Court 2 Service List - Not Part of Order/Judgment 3 || The Clerk of Court is instructed to send the Order/Judgment or other court generated document transmitted herewith to the parties below. The Clerk of Court will send the document 4 || via the BNC or, if checked , via the U.S. mail. 5 6 Debtor(s) Attorney(s) for the Debtor(s) (if any) 7 Brandon and LaRain Maderos Mark W. Briden 1759 Hooker Oak Ave PO Box 493085 8 Chico, CA 95926 Redding, CA 96049 9 || Bankruptcy Trustee (if appointed in the Office of the U.S. Trustee case) Robert T. Matsui United States Courthouse 10 501 I Street, Room 7-500 John W. Reger Sacramento, CA 95814 11 | | 1707 El Capitan Dr 19 Redding, CA 96001 13 || | Attorney(s) for Trustee (if any) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28