Jarvis v. The Claiborne
Jarvis v. The Claiborne
Opinion of the Court
Upon a careful consideration of the evidence in this case, there appear to have been great faults on both sides. At the time the fray happened, the whole ship’s company seems to have been more or less intoxicated; nothing else could have occasioned the captain and mate to make a ring on board, and permit two men to fight a battle on deck. Such a circumstance is sufficient to account for the insubordination of the crew, who ought rather to have been put in irons until they recovered their sober senses. At any rate nothing could justify Captain Sherwood in drawing a cutlass; much less in using it to inflict a severe wound upon the actor [John Jarvis], especially as he was then in irons. The law justifies moderate correction, and more than that had previously been inflicted by the mate, with his fist: from his apparent
Upon the whole, I consider the captain as highly blamable in every stage of the business, and I decree accordingly that he pay this sailor one hundred and fifty dollars, with all the expenses of the suit. As to the mate, I shall not adjudge damages against him, as he punished only with his fist. Moderate correction is often necessary towards seamen; the fist is generally used for the purpose of inflicting- it; and bad consequences seldom follow. I have however, known one instance in which a blow with the fist occasioned death.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- JARVIS v. The CLAIBORNE
- Status
- Published