1894
9 United States District Court for the Southern District of California opinions from 1894.
- Black Diamond Coal Co. v. O'Neil 65 F. 111, (1894)
- United States v. Harris 68 F. 347, (1894)
- In re Tom Yum 64 F. 485, (1894)
- United States v. Greenwald 64 F. 6, (1894)
- United States v. Howell 64 F. 110, (1894)
- Anderson v. The Mary Garrett 63 F. 1009, (1894)
- United States v. Lee Yung 63 F. 520, (1894)
- In re Ezeta 62 F. 972, (1894)
- In re Ezeta 62 F. 964, (1894)
- United States v. Wong Ah Hung 62 F. 1005, (1894)
- Chandler v. The Willamette Valley 63 F. 130, (1894)
- De Lano v. The Alvira 63 F. 144, (1894)
- In re Storror 63 F. 564, (1894)
- United States v. Clune 62 F. 798, (1894)
- In re Grand Jury 62 F. 840, (1894)
- In re Grand Jury 62 F. 834, (1894)
- Gleeson v. The Willamette Valley 62 F. 293, (1894)
- Price v. The Elmbank 62 F. 306, (1894)
- In re Yee Lung 61 F. 641, (1894)
- In re Loo Yue Soon 61 F. 643, (1894)
- Norton v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. 61 F. 618, (1894)
- In re Quan Gin 61 F. 395, (1894)
- Murray v. American Surety Co. of New York 61 F. 273, (1894)
- Lillienthal v. Southern Cal. Ry. Co. 61 F. 622, (1894)
- Bancroft—Whitney Co. v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co. 61 F. 213, (1894)
- United States v. Chew Cheong 61 F. 200, (1894)
- Smith v. Occidental & Oriental Steamship Co. 61 F. 338, (1894)
- Wall v. Leck 61 F. 291, (1894)
- Norton v. Eagle Automatic Can Co. 61 F. 293, (1894)
- In re Deering 60 F. 265, (1894)
- In re Humboldt Lumber Manuf'rs' Ass'n 60 F. 428, (1894)
- United States v. Armstrong 59 F. 568, (1894)