Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /California /Cases /California Federal Courts /United States District Court for the Eastern District of California /

1922

6 United States District Court for the Southern District of California opinions from 1922.

  • Mitchell v. Stephens Dec 27, 1922 285 F. 756; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1189
  • Ex parte Cheuk Gar Lim Dec 18, 1922 285 F. 396; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1156
  • Ex parte Joe Dec 14, 1922 287 F. 545; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1075
  • Townsend v. Lorraine Sep 11, 1922 283 F. 806; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1365
  • The Arakan Jul 17, 1922 283 F. 861; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1380
  • Ex parte Kichmiriantz Jul 13, 1922 283 F. 697; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1356
  • Warren Bros. v. Thompson Jul 5, 1922 282 F. 326; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1399
  • United States v. McCallum May 29, 1922 281 F. 834; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1506
  • Frick v. Webb May 23, 1922 281 F. 407; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1495
  • Ex parte Kwock Seu Lum Mar 17, 1922 287 F. 363; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1069
  • Diligannis v. Mitchell Mar 9, 1922 279 F. 131; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 858
  • Southern Pac. Co. v. Waite Feb 21, 1922 279 F. 171; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 867
  • United States v. Bateman Feb 6, 1922 278 F. 231; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 901
  • United States v. Camarota Feb 6, 1922 278 F. 388; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 913
  • The City of Oakland Jan 13, 1922 277 F. 969; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 980
  • Fitzhugh v. Mitchell Jan 12, 1922 277 F. 966; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 979

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑