Talcott v. United States

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Talcott v. United States, 21 F.2d 493 (1927)
6 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 6961; 1927 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1400; 6 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 6961

Talcott v. United States

Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Herein the court finds for defendant and against plaintiff, and that defendant is entitled to recover of and from plaintiff the amount of the former’s counterclaim, interest, and costs. Judgment accordingly. Stewart v. Stewart, 199 Cal. 318, 249 P. 197, and U. S. v. Robbins, 269 U. S. 315, 46 S. Ct. 148, 70 L. Ed. 285, foreclose all argument, supersede Wardell v. Blum (C. C. A.) 276 F. 226, and require the conclusion herein.

In respect to limitations, the counterclaim is for money paid by mistake, to which, the statutory limitations for collection of taxes have no application, to which is no limitation.

Reference

Full Case Name
TALCOTT v. UNITED STATES
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published