Juan Mejia v. R. Madden

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Juan Mejia v. R. Madden

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WESTERN DIVISION 10 _________________________________ 11 ) JUAN MEJIA, ) No. LA CV 16-06895-VBF-JC 12 ) Petitioner, ) ORDER 13 ) v. ) Adopting the R&R: 14 ) Denying the Habeas Corpus Petition RAYMOND MADDEN (Warden), ) 15 ) Directing Entry of Final Judgment; Respondent. ) Terminating the Case (JS-6) 16 ________________________________)

17 The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on June 18 17, 2019. See CM/ECF Document (“Doc”) 21. Petitioner has not objected within the 19 time allotted by Local Rule 72-3.4, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) requires de novo 20 review only of those parts of an R&R to which a party has timely objected. See Khan 21 v. Langford,

2018 WL 1271204

, *1 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2018) (citing, inter alia, US 22 v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)). But the Advisory 23 Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) recommend that when no timely objection 24 is filed, the Court should review the R&R “for clear error on the face of the record.” 25 Juarez,

2016 WL 2908238

at *2 (cite omitted); accord Douglass v. United Servs. 26 Auto Ass’n,

79 F.3d 1415, 1420

(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); Benitez v. Parmer,

654 F. 27

28 -1- 1 || App’x 502, 503 (2d Cir. 2016) (“Because Benitez thus made only a general objection, 2 || the district court reviewed the 2013 R&R for clear error.”) (citing, inter alia, Adv. 3 | Comm. Notes to 1983 Am. of Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)). The Court finds no clear defect 4 || of law, fact, or logic in the R&R. 5 Accordingly, the Court will accept the Magistrate Judge’s findings and 6 || conclusions and implement the R&R’s recommendations. 8 ORDER 9 The Report and Recommendation [Doc # 21] is ADOPTED. 10 The petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc # 1] is DENIED. 11 This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. 12 As required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), judgment will be entered as a separate 13 || document. 14 The Court will also rule on a certificate of appealability by separate order. 15 The case SHALL BE TERMINATED and closed (JS-6). 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 ‘ . Dated: August 12, 2019 blue furbowhe’ Honorable Valerie Baker Fairbank 19 Senior United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Reference

Status
Unknown