Cassandra Resendez v. Ford Motor Company
Cassandra Resendez v. Ford Motor Company
Trial Court Opinion
FILED HUFFMAN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ——— AUG 16 2019 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL CENTRAL INSTRICT OF □□□□□□□□□□ on BY: □□□ _ DEPUTY MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION 2:19-CV-07175-AB-FFMx IN RE: FORD MOTOR CO. DPS6 POWERSHIFT | TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2814
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) FILED Aug 19, 2019
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —30)
On February 2, 2018, the Panel transferred 75 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Central District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1407. See
289 F.Supp.3d 1350(J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 400 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Central District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Andre Birotte, Jr. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Central District of California and assigned to Judge Birotte. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under
28 U.S.C. § 1407to the Central District of California for the reasons stated in the order of February 2, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Andre Birotte, Jr. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. FOR THE PANEL: CLERK'S OFFICE fb a UNITED STATES MUCTIDISTRICT UITIGATION — John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel ‘ AA I hereby attest and certify on AU = that the foregoing document is full, true ppppEenesig □ and correct copy of the original on file in PS □□□□□ ffice, and i custody. WP □□ ate □□ my office, and in my legal custody. i 4 □□ CLERK U.S. DISTRACT COURT = if {ie } & CENTRAL DISTMACT OP CALIFORMAS □□□□□ □□ SL □□ .7eewy”
IN RE: FORD MOTOR CO. DPS6 POWERSHIFT TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2814
SCHEDULE CTO-30 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS
DIST DIV. CANO, CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 2 18-01632 Huffman v. Ford Motor Company CAE 2 18-01634 Resendez v. Ford Motor Company et al CAE 2 18-01652 McLaughlin v. Ford Motor Company
Reference
- Status
- Unknown