Vagle v. Transworld Systems Inc.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Vagle v. Transworld Systems Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 SAM VAGLE, Case No.: 1:18-cv-01321 LJO JLT

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE

13 v. THE ACTION

14 TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC., et al., (Doc. 25)

15 Defendants.

16 17 On September 12, 2019, Sam Vagle and Transworld Systems, Inc. filed a stipulation to 18 dismiss the action with prejudice. (Doc. 25) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), 19 provides that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of 20 dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the 21 stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose,

111 F.3d 688

, 692 22 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to 23 close this action. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED.

26 Dated: September 13, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28

Reference

Status
Unknown