(PC) Johnson v. Arabia

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HENRY CHARLES JOHNSON, JR., No. 2:18-cv-2221 JAM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOHN ARABIA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On August 26, 2019, the court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants Arabia, Williams, Lee and Warren. That thirty day period has passed, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order.

21 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

23 These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time ///// | may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Y1st, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th | Cir. 1991).

3 | Dated: October 8, 2019 Po Pg, fF /- it LE 9 4 CAROLYN K. DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE | 1 john02221.fusm