UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —164)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

. See

(J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,979 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under

to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL: Inasmuch as no objection is is ied time, the < VL Z AU —_— | hereby certify that the annexed |. Nov 07, 2019 instrument is a true and correct ¢opy of the original on file in my office. Ves, ow Ie por ATTEST: SUSAN Y. SOONG Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of Califomia

Date:.November 7, 2019

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO−164 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 1 19−01458 Minson et al v. Monsanto Company DELAWARE DE 1 19−01760 Miller et al v. Monsanto Company DE 1 19−01768 Miller et al v. Monsanto Company DE 1 19−01769 Brokaw v. Monsanto Company FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 8 19−02486 Wittkamper v. Monsanto Company FLORIDA SOUTHERN FLS 1 19−24070 Thal v. Monsanto Company ILLINOIS NORTHERN ILN 1 19−06420 Gonzalez v. Monsanto Company, Inc. LOUISIANA WESTERN LAW 3 19−01346 Long v. Monsanto Co MINNESOTA MN 0 19−02729 Tschetter v. Monsanto Company MISSOURI EASTERN MOE 4 19−02253 Farkas v. Monsanto Company NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW MEXICO NM 2 19−00970 Davis v. Monsanto Company NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN NCW 5 19−00127 Swedlund v. Monsanto Company OHIO NORTHERN OHN 4 19−02347 Riley v. Monsanto Company OHIO SOUTHERN OHS 1 19−00839 Derifield v. Monsanto Company SOUTH CAROLINA SC 2 19−02791 Miller et al v. Monsanto Company SC 7 19−02735 Stephens v. Monsanto Company WASHINGTON EASTERN WAE 2 19−00345 Sanders et al v. Monsanto Company WAE 4 19−05246 Stolz v. Monsanto Company WASHINGTON WESTERN WAW 2 19−01573 Tostenrude v. Monsanto Company